Table 6

Study-Level Effect Sizes for Dallam et al. 's (2001)

"Well-Designed Nonclinical Studies 

That Controlled for Family Dysfunction"

Vorige Start Omhoog Volgende

[Page 747]

Note

Quality of family environment (FE) control is poor if nonsexual abuse factors are omitted, and very poor if only demographics are controlled for.


CSA = child sexual abuse; ANCOV A = analysis of covariance;

F = female; M = male.

 

Study

Key phrase for CSA operational definition

Control method

Quality of FE control

Gender

N

r

Boney-McCoy & Finkelhor (1995) "Threaten, force, or trick" into sex "you didn't want" ANCOVA Poor F 911 .20
"Threaten, force, or trick" into sex "you didn't want" ANCOVA Poor M 987 .12
Boney-McCoy & Finkelhor (1996) "Threaten, force, or trick" into sex "you didn't want" ANCOVA Poor F 686 .22
"Threaten, force, or trick" into sex "you didn't want" ANCOVA Poor M 771 .14
Dinwiddie et al. (2000) "Forced into sexual activity" Logistic regression, twin control Good F 3,868 .12
"Forced into sexual activity" Logistic regression, twin control Good M 2,078 .08
Fergusson et al. (1996) "Did not want to happen" Logistic regression Good F, M 1,019 .16
Fleming, Mullen, Sibthorpe, & Bammer (1999) <12/5+ or 12-16/5+ "unless wanted or not distressing" Logistic regression Good F 710 .05
Johnson, Cohen, Brown, Smailes, & Bernstein (1999) "Older person touched them or forced them to touch" ANCOVA Good F, M 579 .14
Kendler et al. (2000) "Unwanted" Logistic regression, twin control Good F 1,411 .17
Mullen et al. (1993) "Unwanted sexual advances" Hierarchical regression Good F 414 .16
Stein, Golding, Siegel, Burnam, & Sorenson (1988) "Contact from pressure or force" Logistic regression Very poor F 1,358 .12
"Contact from pressure or force" Logistic regression Very poor M 1,325 .06

 Vorige Start Omhoog Volgende