Authors*Stephanie J, Dallam David H. Gleaves Antonio Cepeda-Benito Joyanna L. Silberg Helena C. Kraemer David Spiegel Psychological Bulletin Vol. 127, No.6, 715-733 AbstractB. Rind, P. Tromovitch, and R. Bauserman (1998) examined the long-term effects of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) by meta-analyzing studies of college students. The authors reported that
The current analysis revealed numerous problems in that study that minimized CSA-adjustment relations, including
Rind et al.'s study's main conclusions were not supported by the original data. As such, attempts to use their study to argue that an individual has not been harmed by sexual abuse constitute a serious misapplication of its findings. * Editorial NoteStephanie J. Dallam, Science Directorate, Leadership Council for Mental Health, Justice, and the Media, Bala Cynwyd. Pennsylvania; David H. Gleaves, Science Directorate, Leadership Council for Mental Health. Justice, and the Media and Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University; Antonio Cepeda-Benito, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University; Joyanna L. Silberg, Science Directorate, Leadership Council for Mental Health, Justice, and the Media and Trauma Disorders Program, Sheppard Pratt Health System, Baltimore. Maryland; Helena C. Kraemer, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; David Spiegel, Science Directorate, Leadership Council for Mental Health, Justice, and the Media and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Stephanie J. Dallam. P.O. Box 258, Spring Hill, Kansas 60683. Electronic mail may be sent to sjd.scout@worldnet.an.net |